ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research.
Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experience of patients considering or using checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for mental health, cognition, and psychological wellbeing in long COVID: a systematic review of registered trials.Psychological medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Feasibility and Acceptability of the Living My Life Program for Rural and Remote Stroke Survivors.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- What do older women want from a physical activity program? Stakeholder consultation to optimise design and recruitment for the Active Women over 50 trial.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Consumer Views on the Role of the Natural Health Products (NHPs) Industry in Pharmacovigilance for NHPs: A Qualitative Study in New Zealand.Drug safety · 2026Article
- From Beliefs to Action: Dietitians' Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability and a Pathway to Planetary Health Framework for Food System Change.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
- "Just (Don't) do It?" Stakeholder Perspectives on Physical Activity Interventions in Adult Acute Mental Health Wards: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Patient Travel Experiences for Methadone Dosing Visits.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Using Student-Reported Digital Daily Logs and Human-Verified AI-Assisted Reflection Coding to Describe Clinical Experiences in Community-Based Clerkships: Exploratory Observational Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Patient Experiences With a Symptom Monitoring and Self-Referral Program for Specialty Palliative Care After Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- A Survey of Australian Healthcare Practitioners' Perspectives on Goal Setting in Occupational Rehabilitation.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The Heart of the Matter: Staff Insights Into Organ Donation Conversations.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Pre-Procedural Safety Screening in Diagnostic Imaging Across England: A Freedom of Information Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- 'Working Together to Meet in the Middle'. A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Power Dynamics in Lived Experience and Family Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Integrating AI-Powered Chatbots Into Patient Education From the Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers, and Nurses: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A qualitative approach to extract diagnostic patterns of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Developing a Competency List for General Practitioners/Family Physicians Providing Care for Dual-Location Residents: Expert Consensus via the Delphi Technique.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient-oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed-methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism.
objectiveAs POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research.
methodsTo address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR. MAIN
resultsThis article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem-solving and the pursuit of social justice. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsReflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed-methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.