ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2022
Performance of artificial intelligence for detection of subtle and advanced colorectal neoplasia.
Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence-based prediction of tumor response in digestive system neoplasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Computer-Assisted Detection (CADe) of colonic polyps during colonoscopy reduces cancer-related healthcare costs - a single Singaporean institution cost effectiveness analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in the detection and characterization of gastrointestinal premalignant and early malignant lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in advanced endoscopic imaging: transforming optical diagnosis in gastroenterology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Real-World Assessment of the Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Diagnosis in Colonoscopy: A Single Institution Cohort Study in Singapore.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted operative anatomy recognition in endoscopic pituitary surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) in Digestive Healthcare: Regulatory Challenges and Ethical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Identifying key mechanisms leading to visual recognition errors for missed colorectal polyps using eye-tracking technology.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Review
- Challenges in artificial intelligence for polyp detection.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThere is uncertainty regarding the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect advanced subtle neoplasia, particularly flat lesions and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), due to low prevalence in testing datasets and prospective trials. This has been highlighted as a top research priority for the field.
methodsAn AI algorithm was evaluated on four video test datasets containing 173 polyps (35,114 polyp-positive frames and 634,988 polyp-negative frames) specifically enriched with flat lesions and SSLs, including a challenging dataset containing subtle advanced neoplasia. The challenging dataset was also evaluated by eight endoscopists (four independent, four trainees, according to the Joint Advisory Group on gastrointestinal endoscopy [JAG] standards in the UK).
resultsIn the first two video datasets, the algorithm achieved per-polyp sensitivities of 100% and 98.9%. Per-frame sensitivities were 84.1% and 85.2%. In the subtle dataset, the algorithm detected a significantly higher number of polyps (P < 0.0001), compared to JAG-independent and trainee endoscopists, achieving per-polyp sensitivities of 79.5%, 37.2% and 11.5%, respectively. Furthermore, when considering subtle polyps detected by both the algorithm and at least one endoscopist, the AI detected polyps significantly faster on average.
conclusionsThe AI based algorithm achieved high per-polyp sensitivities for advanced colorectal neoplasia, including flat lesions and SSLs, outperforming both JAG independent and trainees on a very challenging dataset containing subtle lesions that could have been overlooked easily and contribute to interval colorectal cancer. Further prospective trials should evaluate AI to detect subtle advanced neoplasia in higher risk populations for colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.