Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748665›Full record

ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2022

Performance of artificial intelligence for detection of subtle and advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Omer F Ahmad, Juana González-Bueno Puyal, Patrick Brandao, Rawen Kader, Faisal Abbasi, Mohamed Hussein, Rehan J Haidry, Daniel Toth, Peter Mountney, Ed Seward and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  13. Challenges in artificial intelligence for polyp detection.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Omer F AhmadWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Juana González-Bueno PuyalWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Patrick BrandaoWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Rawen KaderWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Faisal AbbasiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Mohamed HusseinWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Rehan J HaidryDivision of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Daniel TothOdin Vision Ltd, London, UK.
Peter MountneyOdin Vision Ltd, London, UK.
Ed SewardGastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Roser VegaGastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Danail StoyanovWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
Laurence B LovatWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London.
University College London · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GBLondon Vision Clinic · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) at UCL 203145Z/16/ZWellcome 203145Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is uncertainty regarding the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to detect advanced subtle neoplasia, particularly flat lesions and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), due to low prevalence in testing datasets and prospective trials. This has been highlighted as a top research priority for the field.

methodsAn AI algorithm was evaluated on four video test datasets containing 173 polyps (35,114 polyp-positive frames and 634,988 polyp-negative frames) specifically enriched with flat lesions and SSLs, including a challenging dataset containing subtle advanced neoplasia. The challenging dataset was also evaluated by eight endoscopists (four independent, four trainees, according to the Joint Advisory Group on gastrointestinal endoscopy [JAG] standards in the UK).

resultsIn the first two video datasets, the algorithm achieved per-polyp sensitivities of 100% and 98.9%. Per-frame sensitivities were 84.1% and 85.2%. In the subtle dataset, the algorithm detected a significantly higher number of polyps (P < 0.0001), compared to JAG-independent and trainee endoscopists, achieving per-polyp sensitivities of 79.5%, 37.2% and 11.5%, respectively. Furthermore, when considering subtle polyps detected by both the algorithm and at least one endoscopist, the AI detected polyps significantly faster on average.

conclusionsThe AI based algorithm achieved high per-polyp sensitivities for advanced colorectal neoplasia, including flat lesions and SSLs, outperforming both JAG independent and trainees on a very challenging dataset containing subtle lesions that could have been overlooked easily and contribute to interval colorectal cancer. Further prospective trials should evaluate AI to detect subtle advanced neoplasia in higher risk populations for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceColonoscopyHumansartificial intelligencecolonic polypscolonoscopycolorectal neoplasmsdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34748665
OpenAlexW3214408047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.