Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748614›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Magnification effect on fine motor skills of dental students.

Danielle Wajngarten, Júlia Margato Pazos, Vinícius Perassoli Menegazzo, Juliana Pimentel Duarte Novo, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementing Deflection Loupes in Endodontic Training of General Dentistry Residents: Effects on Treatment Quality, Procedure Time and Ergonomics.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle WajngartenDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Júlia Margato PazosDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8832-8796
Vinícius Perassoli MenegazzoDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Juliana Pimentel Duarte NovoDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso GarciaDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study observed the effect of different magnification systems on dental students' real and perceived fine motor skills.

methodsThis was a laboratory-based experimental study. Students in the fifth year of an undergraduate dentistry program (N = 92) participated in this study. The dependent variables were real motor skills, perceived motor skills and time required to complete the fine motor skills test. The independent variable was the use of a magnification system under four conditions. For each condition, the Dental Manual Dexterity Assessment was performed, which consisted of inserting the #3195FF bur into targets positioned on a Styrofoam plate. The accuracy of each penetration of the targets was scored, using a point system with a maximum possible score of 246 points. Students' perceived fine motor skills were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from zero for no skills to ten for maximum skills. A descriptive statistical analysis and the repeated measures ANOVA were performed (α = 0.05).

resultsThe Galilean and Keplerian loupes were found to positively affect students' real fine motor skills (p<0.01); however, perceived fine motor skills and time were significantly better (p<0.01) under the naked eye.

conclusionsDental students' real fine motor skills were better when Galilean and Keplerian loupes were used, but the perceived fine motor skills were not.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsStudents, DentalAdultEducation, DentalFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34748614
PMCPMC8575251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.