Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Exploring the effects of degraded vision on sensorimotor performance.

William E A Sheppard, Polly Dickerson, Rigmor C Baraas, Mark Mon-Williams, Brendan T Barrett, Richard M Wilkie, Rachel O Coats

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impaired binocular vision with bangerter foil and its influence on fine motor skills: a clinical observational, randomized and cross-sectional study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

William E A SheppardSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2691-6469
Polly DickersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Rigmor C BaraasDepartment of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-7617
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Brendan T BarrettFaculty of Life Sciences, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Richard M WilkieSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Rachel O CoatsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NOYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S037527/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany people experience unilateral degraded vision, usually owing to a developmental or age-related disorder. There are unresolved questions regarding the extent to which such unilateral visual deficits impact on sensorimotor performance; an important issue as sensorimotor limitations can constrain quality of life by restricting 'activities of daily living'. Examination of the relationship between visual deficit and sensorimotor performance is essential for determining the functional implications of ophthalmic conditions. This study attempts to explore the effect of unilaterally degraded vision on sensorimotor performance.

methodsIn Experiment 1 we simulated visual deficits in 30 participants using unilateral and bilateral Bangerter filters to explore whether motor performance was affected in water pouring, peg placing, and aiming tasks. Experiment 2 (n = 74) tested the hypothesis that kinematic measures are associated with visuomotor deficits by measuring the impact of small visual sensitivity decrements created by monocular viewing on sensorimotor interactions with targets presented on a planar surface in aiming, tracking and steering tasks.

resultsIn Experiment 1, the filters caused decreased task performance-confirming that unilateral (and bilateral) visual loss has functional implications. In Experiment 2, kinematic measures were affected by monocular viewing in two of three tasks requiring rapid online visual feedback (aiming and steering).

conclusionsUnilateral visual loss has a measurable impact on sensorimotor performance. The benefits of binocular vision may be particularly important for some groups (e.g. older adults) where an inability to complete sensorimotor tasks may necessitate assisted living. There is an urgent need to develop rigorous kinematic approaches to the quantification of the functional impact of unilaterally degraded vision and of the benefits associated with treatments for unilateral ophthalmic conditions to enable informed decisions around treatment.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaEyeFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceQuality of LifeTask Performance and AnalysisVision, BinocularVision DisordersVision, MonocularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34748569
PMCPMC8575268
OpenAlexW3214143322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.