Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748531›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Mutation rate dynamics reflect ecological change in an emerging zoonotic pathogen.

Gemma G R Murray, Andrew J Balmer, Josephine Herbert, Nazreen F Hadjirin, Caroline L Kemp, Marta Matuszewska, Sebastian Bruchmann, A S Md Mukarram Hossain, Marcelo Gottschalk, Alexander W Tucker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. AncientScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The emergence and diversification of a zoonotic pathogen from within the microbiota of intensively farmed pigs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gemma G R MurrayDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9531-1711
Andrew J BalmerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-3428
Josephine HerbertDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8352-6344
Nazreen F HadjirinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Caroline L KempDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0015-3678
Marta MatuszewskaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-7725
Sebastian BruchmannDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-5386
A S Md Mukarram HossainDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-8982
Marcelo GottschalkDépartement de Pathologie et Microbiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2196-2212
Alexander W TuckerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-0843
Eric MillerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7157-6213
Lucy A WeinertDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-6012
University of Cambridge · GBUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018934/1Medical Research Council MR/V032836/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109385/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation rates vary both within and between bacterial species, and understanding what drives this variation is essential for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of bacterial populations. In this study, we investigate two factors that are predicted to influence the mutation rate: ecology and genome size. We conducted mutation accumulation experiments on eight strains of the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. Natural variation within this species allows us to compare tonsil carriage and invasive disease isolates, from both more and less pathogenic populations, with a wide range of genome sizes. We find that invasive disease isolates have repeatedly evolved mutation rates that are higher than those of closely related carriage isolates, regardless of variation in genome size. Independent of this variation in overall rate, we also observe a stronger bias towards G/C to A/T mutations in isolates from more pathogenic populations, whose genomes tend to be smaller and more AT-rich. Our results suggest that ecology is a stronger correlate of mutation rate than genome size over these timescales, and that transitions to invasive disease are consistently accompanied by rapid increases in mutation rate. These results shed light on the impact that ecology can have on the adaptive potential of bacterial pathogens.

Indexed as

Mutation RateAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingEcologyStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus suisVirulenceZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34748531
PMCPMC8601623
OpenAlexW3213570143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.