Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748523›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2021

Improve Integration of In Vitro Biofilm Body of Knowledge to Support Clinical Breakthroughs in Surgical Site Infection.

Stuart Irwin, Brett Wagner Mackenzie, Brya G Matthews, Dustin L Williams, Jillian Cornish, Simon Swift

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stuart IrwinDepartment of Medicine (Irwin and Dr. Cornish), Department of Surgery (Dr. Wagner Mackenzie), and Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology (Dr. Matthews and Dr. Swift), The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; (Dr. Williams); Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Dr. Williams), Department of Pathology (Dr. Williams), Department of Bioengineering (Dr. Williams), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD (Dr. Williams).ORCID 0000-0002-0379-573
Brett Wagner Mackenzie
Brya G Matthews
Dustin L Williams
Jillian Cornish
Simon Swift
Williams (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosthetics increase the risk of deep surgical site infections in procedures intended to restore function. In orthopaedics, prosthetic joint infections can lead to repetitive surgeries, amputation, or worse. Biofilm formation both in vitro and in vivo involves stages of attachment, accumulation, and maturation. The level of maturation affects susceptibility to antibiotics, the immune system, and the success of surgical interventions. A review of the literature indicates that orthopedic publications are less likely to mention biofilm. We have reviewed animal models of infection to assess in vivo models of prosthetic infection. Although most prosthetic infections seem to originate from local skin microbiota, clinically representative biofilm inocula are unusual. Biofilm-related end points are more widely adopted, but studies rarely include both quantification of adherent microbial burden and imaging of the in vivo biofilm. Failure to differentiate between planktonic and biofilm infections can skew research away from needed chronic disease models. In this review, we address prosthetic joint infections as an important model for chronic biofilm infection research, identify critical requirements for in vivo models of chronic infection, and propose that resistance to the terminology of biofilm research exists within both research and regulation, which could limit progress toward important orthopaedic targets.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34748523
PMCPMC8575432
OpenAlexW3213496236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.