Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748447›Full record

ArticleHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy2023

Key performance and training parameters in primary total hip arthroplasty - an expert consensus using the Delphi technique.

Daniel Howgate, Patrick Garfjeld Roberts, Ben Kendrick, Jonathan Rees

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The risk of revision surgery after trainee-led primary total hip replacement.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Acetabular cup size trends in total hip arthroplasty.World journal of orthopedics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel HowgateUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-3305
Patrick Garfjeld RobertsUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Ben KendrickUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Jonathan ReesUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrimary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed and successful operation which orthopaedic trainees must demonstrate competence in prior to completion of surgical training. An assessment of agreement between surgical trainers regarding the critical steps of a primary THA has never been undertaken. The aim of this study was to define and rank the key steps of a primary THA regards ease of teaching and their importance in achieving the best patient outcome. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Delphi technique with 3 iterative rounds was used to establish expert group consensus. The benchmark for consensus was set at an 80% agreement in any category for each step of a THR. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to report on the inter- and intra-rater reliabilities between and within participants responses respectively in rounds 2 and 3.

results50 consultant orthopaedic hip surgeons completed round 2, and 28 completed round 3. Overall, 27 steps (54 parameters) were identified, with 16 parameters achieving consensus agreement for their impact on patient outcome, and 17 for ease of teaching. The inter-rater ICC for patient outcome parameters was 0.89 and 0.92 in rounds 2 and 3 respectively while for teaching parameters it was 0.82 and 0.73. 50% of surgeons agreed that acetabular reaming, assessing and accurately restoring leg length, and acetabular cup anteversion were the 3 most difficult steps to teach trainees, while 90% agreed these 3 steps were substantially important to patient outcome. Another 5 steps achieved consensus for their substantial impact on patient outcome but failed to achieve consensus for ease of teaching.

conclusionsThe results of this expert consensus have produced a rank-order list of the key steps in primary THA, which may be used for orthopaedic curriculum development and guiding focused improvements for surgical training in primary THR including simulation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipAcetabulumConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansDelphiexpert consensusmedical educationsurgical trainingtotal hip arthroplastytotal hip replacement

Identifiers

PMID34748447
PMCPMC10170576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.