ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2022
The Index of Productive Syntax: Psychometric Properties and Suggested Modifications.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Mean Length of Utterance: Novel Measures for Characterizing the Spoken Language of Autistic Children.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Developmental Sentence Scoring for Preschool Language Sample Analysis: A Psychometric Update.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Beyond Test Scores: Using Drawings and Language Samples to Characterize Multilingual Children's Language Profiles.Seminars in speech and language · 2025Article
- Should We Stop Using Lexical Diversity Measures in Children's Language Sample Analysis?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Deaf and Hearing American Sign Language-English Bilinguals: Typical Bilingual Language Development.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2023Article
- Assessment and Therapy Goal Planning Using Free Computerized Language Analysis Software.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023Article
- Assessing for Developmental Language Disorder in the Context of African American English.EBP briefs · 2023Article
- Dynamic Norming and Open Science.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Measurement of Lexical Diversity in Children's Spoken Language: Computational and Conceptual Considerations.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Language sample analysis of conversation samples from school-age children who stutter: The role of syntactic factors in stuttering.Journal of communication disordersArticle
- Using language sample analyses across English dialects: A case-based approach for preschoolers.Clinical linguistics & phoneticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Index of Productive Syntax (IPSyn) is a well-known language sample analysis tool. However, its psychometric properties have not been assessed across a wide sample of typically developing preschool-age children and children with language disorders. We sought to determine the profile of IPSyn scores by age over early childhood. We additionally explored whether the IPSyn could be shortened to fewer items without loss of information and whether the required language sample could be shortened from a current required number of 100 utterances to 50.
methodWe used transcripts from the Child Language Data Exchange System, including 1,051 samples of adult-child conversational play with toys within the theoretical framework of item response theory. Samples included those from typically developing children as well as children with hearing loss, Down syndrome, and late language emergence.
resultsThe Verb Phrase and Sentence Structure subscales showed more stable developmental trajectories over the preschool years and greater differentiation between typical and atypical cohorts than did the Noun Phrase and Question/Negation subscales. A number of current IPSyn scoring items can be dropped without loss of information, and 50-utterance samples demonstrate most of the same psychometric properties of longer samples. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest ways in which the IPSyn can be automated and streamlined (proposed IPSyn-C) so as to provide useful clinical guidance with fewer items and a shorter required language sample. Reference values for the IPSyn-C are provided. Trajectories for one subscale (Question/Negation) appear inherently unstable and may require structured elicitation. Potential limitations, ramifications, and future directions are discussed. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16915690.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.