ArticleArthritis care & research2023
Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: hemodynamic challenges, maternal risk, and multidisciplinary management.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- A Successful Monitoring of a Pregnant Woman Suffering from Mixed Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Critical deterioration of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia during pregnancy.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Managing a new diagnosis of interstitial lung disease in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2023Article
- Researchers in rheumatology should avoid categorization of continuous predictor variables.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWomen with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are recommended to avoid pregnancy based on limited data. This study seeks to determine maternal and pregnancy outcomes in the largest-to-date cohort of patients with ILD.
methodsMedical records in the Duke University Health System were reviewed for pregnancies in patients with a diagnosis of ILD with underlying autoimmune disease. Pregnancies were classified as having very severe, severe, mild-moderate, or normal lung function based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) were defined using the Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome APO (PROMISSE-APO) and Severe PROMISSE-APO criteria.
resultsAmong 86 pregnancies in 60 women, 85% women were Black, 71% had sarcoidosis, and 29% had connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Of the pregnancies with available PFTs (n = 59), 12% had very severe ILD, 25% had severe ILD, 51% had mild-moderate ILD, and 12% had normal lung function. PROMISSE-APOs occurred in 32% of pregnancies, including all pregnancies with very severe ILD (P = 0.02 across severity groups), 56% of pregnancies with CTD-ILD, and 23% with sarcoidosis (P = 0.02). Severe PROMISSE-APOs occurred in 15% of pregnancies, including 60% with very severe ILD and 28% with CTD-ILD. There were no maternal deaths. One woman required an intensive care hospital stay during pregnancy. Three women had volume overload after delivery that resolved with medical management. Seven women received oxygen during delivery, although none were intubated.
conclusionAlthough APOs were common in women with very severe ILD and underlying CTD, overall maternal morbidity and mortality were low. These data suggest women with ILD may be able to safely attempt pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.