ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2021
Orofacial injuries in child family homicide: a population study.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Child family violence homicide (FVH) is a significant public health problem in Australia and globally. Population-wide studies of orofacial injuries in child FVH are uncommon despite their recognized importance. This whole population descriptive study of orofacial injuries in child FVH in Victoria, Australia aims to implement a novel methodological approach to provide an overview of child FVH and describe frequency and patterns of abusive orofacial injuries. Closed cases of child FVH aged 0-17 years, January 2000-December 2018, were identified from screening all Victorian assault deaths for eligible offender relationships. Significant associations of clinical/demographic characteristics were explored using two-step clustering and the Spearman correlation coefficient. Of 895 closed homicide cases, 358 were FV-related. Of the 53 child FVH, 40 were eligible for injury analysis with 36 of these cases (90%) having orofacial injuries. Among these 36 cases, 72% were aged 0-4 years, males predominated (64%) and the injury mechanism was blunt force for 56%. The discrete orofacial injury frequency was associated with the non-orofacial injury frequency (rho: 0.362, 2-tailed p < 0.03). A three-cluster statistical solution was identified, each represented by an injury mechanism. The largest cluster identified a pattern of blunt force trauma in 0-4 years with drug presence, high average non-orofacial injury numbers and parent-offenders. A novel methodological approach was implemented to comprehensively describe the frequency, nature, patterns and risk indicators of orofacial injuries in child FVH. It explored associations between a wide range of clinical and demographic characteristics, which might have otherwise been missed in summary description. These methods will potentially underpin future comparative studies of intentional-unintentional child injuries and fatal-nonfatal child abuse. The study narrows a significant research gap regarding patterns of inflicted injuries, and demographic and clinical indicators in child FVH potentially informing future systematic classification processes, risk assessment tools and pathways to FV intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.