ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2021
A novel four-step feature selection technique for diabetic retinopathy grading.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy and clinical performance of deep learning models for grading diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Visual impairment prevention by early detection of diabetic retinopathy based on stacked auto-encoder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel fusion of genetic grey wolf optimization and kernel extreme learning machines for precise diabetic eye disease classification.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Present and Future of Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Image in Diabetes Mellitus: Focus on Analytical Methods and Limitations of Clinical Use.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Automated grading of diabetic retinopathy using CNN with hierarchical clustering of image patches by siamese network.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy is a microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus that develops over time. Diabetic retinopathy is one of the retinal disorders. Early detection of diabetic retinopathy reduces the chances of permanent vision loss. However, the identification and regular diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy is a time-consuming task and requires expert ophthalmologists and radiologists. In addition, an automatic diabetic retinopathy detection technique is necessary for real-time applications to facilitate and minimize potential human errors. Therefore, we propose an ensemble deep neural network and a novel four-step feature selection technique in this paper. In the first step, the preprocessed entropy images improve the quality of the retinal features. Second, the features are extracted using a deep ensemble model include InceptionV3, ResNet101, and Vgg19 from the retinal fundus images. Then, these features are combined to create an ample feature space. To reduce the feature space, we propose four-step feature selection techniques: minimum redundancy, maximum relevance, Chi-Square, ReliefF, and F test for selecting efficient features. Further, appropriate features are chosen from the majority voting techniques to reduce the computational complexity. Finally, the standard machine learning classifier, support vector machines, is used in diabetic retinopathy classification. The proposed method is tested on Kaggle, MESSIDOR-2, and IDRiD databases, available publicly. The proposed algorithm provided an accuracy of 97.78%, a sensitivity of 97.6%, and a specificity of 99.3%, using top 300 features, which are better than other state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.