Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748101›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2021

How does DICOM support big data management? Investigating its use in medical imaging community.

Marco Aiello, Giuseppina Esposito, Giulio Pagliari, Pasquale Borrelli, Valentina Brancato, Marco Salvatore

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06877182 (Novel Neuroradiological Workflow for the Assisted DIAgnosis and Management of DEMentia with Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06877182 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Novel Neuroradiological Workflow for the Assisted DIAgnosis and Management of DEMentia with Artificial Intelligence

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS SYNLAB SDNRan2024 to 2027Enrolled80,000ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, DementiaArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging with Contrast
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. WCCAN: Windowed Cross-contrast Attention Network for Multi-contrast Brain MR Image Super-resolution.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco AielloIRCCS SDN, Via Emanuele Gianturco 113, 80143, Naples, Italy. marco.aiello@synlab.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-0664
Giuseppina EspositoBio Check Up S.R.L, Naples, Italy.
Giulio PagliariBio Check Up S.R.L, Naples, Italy.
Pasquale BorrelliIRCCS SDN, Via Emanuele Gianturco 113, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Valentina BrancatoIRCCS SDN, Via Emanuele Gianturco 113, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, Via Emanuele Gianturco 113, 80143, Naples, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca ARS0100144 Prot. U.001378531-08-2018Regione Campania D54I20001410002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic imaging field is experiencing considerable growth, followed by increasing production of massive amounts of data. The lack of standardization and privacy concerns are considered the main barriers to big data capitalization. This work aims to verify whether the advanced features of the DICOM standard, beyond imaging data storage, are effectively used in research practice. This issue will be analyzed by investigating the publicly shared medical imaging databases and assessing how much the most common medical imaging software tools support DICOM in all its potential. Therefore, 100 public databases and ten medical imaging software tools were selected and examined using a systematic approach. In particular, the DICOM fields related to privacy, segmentation and reporting have been assessed in the selected database; software tools have been evaluated for reading and writing the same DICOM fields. From our analysis, less than a third of the databases examined use the DICOM format to record meaningful information to manage the images. Regarding software, the vast majority does not allow the management, reading and writing of some or all the DICOM fields. Surprisingly, if we observe chest computed tomography data sharing to address the COVID-19 emergency, there are only two datasets out of 12 released in DICOM format. Our work shows how the DICOM can potentially fully support big data management; however, further efforts are still needed from the scientific and technological community to promote the use of the existing standard, encouraging data sharing and interoperability for a concrete development of big data analytics.

Indexed as

Big dataCOVID-19Data analyticsData curationDICOM

Identifiers

PMID34748101
PMCPMC8574146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.