SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2022
Effect of maternal dietary niacin intake on congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Niacin Supplementation Alleviates TCIPP-Induced Lung Injury via Inhibition of the NF-κB Signaling Pathway.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective effect of niacin in a rat model of obesity induced by high-fat-rich diet.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national epidemiology of congenital birth defects in children from 1990 to 2021: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Management of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia in Pregnancy With Niacin: Reevaluating Safety and Therapeutic Benefits.Case reports in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Association between niacin intake and chronic kidney disease in male participants-a cross-sectional study from the NHANES (2005-2018).Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Supplementation with NAD+ and its precursors: A rescue of female reproductive diseases.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Review
- Lipid-Lowering Nutraceuticals for an Integrative Approach to Dyslipidemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Can niacin supplementation prevent congenital malformations associated with maternal use of proton pump inhibitors?European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Response to the letter to editor: Can niacin supplementation prevent congenital malformations associated with maternal use of proton pump inhibitors?European journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Review
- Differential responses to maternal diabetes in embryo and visceral yolk sac.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe significance of niacin in embryonic development has clinical implications in the counseling of pregnant women and may be used to inform nutrition recommendations. This study, therefore, aims to review the associations between maternal periconceptional niacin intake and congenital anomalies.
methodsA systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, AMED, CENTRAL, Emcare, EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care and Google Scholar was conducted between inception and 30 September 2020. Medical subject heading terms included "nicotinic acids" and related metabolites, "congenital anomalies" and specific types of congenital anomalies. Included studies reported the association between maternal niacin intake and congenital anomalies in their offspring and reported the measure of association. Studies involved solely the women with co-morbidities, animal, in vitro and qualitative studies were excluded. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random effects-restricted maximum likelihood model was used to obtain summary estimates, and multivariable meta-regression model was used to adjust study-level covariates.
resultsOf 21,908 retrieved citations, 14 case-control studies including 35,743 women met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies were conducted in the U.S, three in Netherlands and one in South Africa. The meta-analysis showed that expectant mothers with an insufficient niacin intake were significantly more likely to have babies with congenital abnormalities (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.24) compared to mothers with adequate niacin intake. A similar association between niacin deficiency and congenital anomalies was observed (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.26) when sensitivity analysis was conducted by quality of the included studies. Meta-regression showed neither statistically significant impact of study size (p = 0.859) nor time of niacin assessment (p = 0.127). The overall quality of evidence used is high-thirteen studies achieved a rating of six or seven stars out of a possible nine based on the NOS.
conclusionInadequate maternal niacin intake is associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring. These findings may have implications in dietary counseling and use of niacin supplementation during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.