Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748060›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2022

Effect of maternal dietary niacin intake on congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shanika Palawaththa, Rakibul M Islam, Dragan Illic, Kate Rabel, Marie Lee, Lorena Romero, Xing Yu Leung, Md Nazmul Karim

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Differential responses to maternal diabetes in embryo and visceral yolk sac.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shanika Palawaththa *School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rakibul M Islam *School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dragan IllicSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate RabelSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Marie LeeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lorena RomeroThe Alfred Hospital, The Ian Potter Library, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Xing Yu LeungSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Md Nazmul KarimSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. nazmul.karim@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-9649
Monash University · AUMonash Health · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe significance of niacin in embryonic development has clinical implications in the counseling of pregnant women and may be used to inform nutrition recommendations. This study, therefore, aims to review the associations between maternal periconceptional niacin intake and congenital anomalies.

methodsA systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, AMED, CENTRAL, Emcare, EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care and Google Scholar was conducted between inception and 30 September 2020. Medical subject heading terms included "nicotinic acids" and related metabolites, "congenital anomalies" and specific types of congenital anomalies. Included studies reported the association between maternal niacin intake and congenital anomalies in their offspring and reported the measure of association. Studies involved solely the women with co-morbidities, animal, in vitro and qualitative studies were excluded. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random effects-restricted maximum likelihood model was used to obtain summary estimates, and multivariable meta-regression model was used to adjust study-level covariates.

resultsOf 21,908 retrieved citations, 14 case-control studies including 35,743 women met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies were conducted in the U.S, three in Netherlands and one in South Africa. The meta-analysis showed that expectant mothers with an insufficient niacin intake were significantly more likely to have babies with congenital abnormalities (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.24) compared to mothers with adequate niacin intake. A similar association between niacin deficiency and congenital anomalies was observed (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.26) when sensitivity analysis was conducted by quality of the included studies. Meta-regression showed neither statistically significant impact of study size (p = 0.859) nor time of niacin assessment (p = 0.127). The overall quality of evidence used is high-thirteen studies achieved a rating of six or seven stars out of a possible nine based on the NOS.

conclusionInadequate maternal niacin intake is associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring. These findings may have implications in dietary counseling and use of niacin supplementation during pregnancy.

Indexed as

NiacinCase-Control StudiesDietFemaleHumansNutritional StatusOdds RatioPregnancyNiacinBirth defectCongenital anomalyNADNiacinPregnancy outcomeVitamin B3

Identifiers

PMID34748060
OpenAlexW3211555657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.