ArticleJAMA2021
Addressing Racism in Preventive Services: Methods Report to Support the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Article in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development of a Health Equity Framework for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA network open · 2024Guideline
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Youth With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- "Shifting the Culture and the Way That We Practice": Perinatal Clinicians' Cognitive, Behavioral, and Team-Level Changes Following Equity-Focused Interventions.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Language and Demographic Disparities in Social Needs and Referral Preferences in the Pediatric ED.Academic pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Barriers and facilitators of breast cancer screening services amongst black African women in high income countries: a systematic review and meta-aggregation.Discover public health · 2026Review
- Sacral dysmorphism and safe zone dimensions: racial, ethnic and sex-based anatomical considerations for percutaneous iliosacral screw placement.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Affordability, negative experiences, perceived racism, and health care system distrust among black American women aged 45 and over.AIMS public health · 2024Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States: The contribution of vaccine-related attitudes.Preventive medicine · 2023Article
- The role of structural racism and geographical inequity in diabetes outcomes.Lancet (London, England) · 2023Review
- The Current State of Antiracism Curricula in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of US Academic Health Centers.Annals of family medicine · 2023Article
- Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Article
- Ten-Year Trends of Persistent Mortality With Gallstone Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Jersey.Gastro hep advances · 2023Article
- Suicides Among Non-Elderly Adult Hispanics, 2010-2020.Journal of community health · 2022Article
- Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Understanding Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Hesitancy in Racial and Ethnic Minority Caregivers.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Attitudes and Actions Related to Racism: the Anti-RaCism (ARC) Survey Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Structural Racism and Health Disparities in the Philippines.International forum for nursing and healthcare · 2022Article
- Social Determinants of Health, Race, and Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Black/African Americans as a Population Exemplar.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In January 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a values statement that acknowledged systemic racism and included a commitment to address racism and health equity in recommendations for clinical preventive services. Objectives: To articulate the definitional and conceptual issues around racism and health inequity and to describe how racism and health inequities are currently addressed in preventive health. Methods: An audit was conducted assessing (1) published literature on frameworks or policy and position statements addressing racism, (2) a subset of cancer and cardiovascular topics in USPSTF reports, (3) recent systematic reviews on interventions to reduce health inequities in preventive health or to prevent racism in health care, and (4) health care-relevant professional societies, guideline-making organizations, agencies, and funding bodies to gather information about how they are addressing racism and health equity. Findings: Race as a social category does not have biological underpinnings but has biological consequences through racism. Racism is complex and pervasive, operates at multiple interrelated levels, and exerts negative effects on other social determinants and health and well-being through multiple pathways. In its reports, the USPSTF has addressed racial and ethnic disparities, but not racism explicitly. The systematic reviews to support the USPSTF include interventions that may mitigate health disparities through cultural tailoring of behavioral interventions, but reviews have not explicitly addressed other commonly studied interventions to increase the uptake of preventive services or foster the implementation of preventive services. Many organizations have issued recent statements and commitments around racism in health care, but few have provided substantive guidance on operational steps to address the effects of racism. Where guidance is unavailable regarding the proposed actions, it is principally because work to achieve them is in very early stages. The most directly relevant and immediately useful guidance identified is that from the GRADE working group. Conclusions and Relevance: This methods report provides a summary of issues around racism and health inequity, including the status of how these are being addressed in preventive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.