Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34747412›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2021

Combined Mechanical and Enzymatic Dissociation of Mouse Brain Hippocampal Tissue.

Madison Trujillo, Taylor McElroy, Taurean Brown, Pilar Simmons, Fabio Ntagwabira, Antiño R Allen

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madison TrujilloDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; mtrujillo@uams.edu.
Taylor McElroyDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Taurean BrownDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Pilar SimmonsDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Fabio NtagwabiraDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Antiño R AllenDivision of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; aallen@uams.edu.

Funding

The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Initiative for Maximizing Student Development ProgramR25GM083247 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MCGEHEE, ROBERT E, THOMAS, BILLY R · 2009 to 2023
$5.4M
MnBuOE as a Novel Chemosensitizer for Breast Cancer and NeuroprotectorR01CA258673 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ALLEN, ANTINO RECIO · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258673NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM083247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This neural dissociation protocol (an adaptation of the protocol accompanying a commercial adult brain dissociation kit) optimizes tissue processing in preparation for detailed downstream analysis such as flow cytometry or single-cell sequencing. Neural dissociation can be conducted via mechanical dissociation (such as using filters, chopping techniques, or pipette trituration), enzymatic digestion, or a combination thereof. The delicate nature of neuronal cells can complicate efforts to obtain the highly viable, true single-cell suspension with minimal cellular debris that is required for single-cell analysis. The data demonstrate that this combination of automated mechanical dissociation and enzymatic digestion consistently yields a highly viable (>90%) single-cell suspension, overcoming the aforementioned difficulties. While a few of the steps require manual dexterity, these steps lessen sample handling and potential cell loss. This manuscript details each step of the process to equip other laboratories to successfully dissociate small quantities of neural tissue in preparation for downstream analysis.

Indexed as

BrainHippocampusAnimalsCell SeparationFlow CytometryMiceNeurons

Identifiers

PMID34747412
PMCPMC9208324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.