Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34747388›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2021

Early complication of a subtrochanteric periprosthetic fracture following hip resurfacing. Is varus healing acceptable? A case report and literature review.

Giovanni Lugani, Alessandro Santandrea, Leonardo Puddu, Massimo Rigoni, Fabrizio Cont, Bruno Magnan, Fabrizio Cortese

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Giovanni Lugania:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Università di Verona";}. giovannilugani@gmail.com.
Alessandro Santandrea. alessandro.santandrea@apss.tn.it.
Leonardo Puddu. l.puddu86@gmail.com.
Massimo Rigoni. massimo.rigoni@apss.tn.it.
Fabrizio Cont. fabrizio.cont@apss.tn.it.
Bruno Magnan. bruno.magnan@univr.it.
Fabrizio Cortese. fabrizio.cortese@apss.tn.it.
Instituto Tecnológico de Apizaco · MXIstituto Tecnico Industriale Alessandro Volta · ITITMO University · RUJiangnan University · CNPurdue Pharma (Canada) · CAUniversité de Corse Pascal Paoli · FRUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in the incidence of osteoarthritis of the hip (coxarthrosis) in young patients with high functionality requirements and the development of new materials in the last twenty years have resulted in an increase in the number of surgeries involving hip resurfacing procedures. There has also been an increase in associated periprosthetic fractures, which currently occur in 1%-2% of cases. According to the medical literature, fractures of this type can be treated conservatively, using reduction and synthesis or through prosthetic revision. CASE REPORT: Patient aged 69 years who had undergone resurfacing of the right hip ten years previously, who came to our attention as a result of direct contusion trauma with x-ray evidence of a periprosthetic fracture in the subtrochanteric region. We treated the fracture by preserving the prosthesis and performing osteosynthesis using a plate and screws. After two months the synthesis was complicated by breakage of a proximal screw and varus collapse of the fracture. We treated this complication conservatively by adjusting the weight-bearing regime and administering physical and drug therapy. Six months after the fracture, despite the residual varus displacement and the less than stellar x-ray result, the clinical outcome was satisfactory. Discussion and conclusions: Treatment of periprosthetic fractures following hip resurfacing is often technically complex. The major difficulties arise from the presence of prosthetic components and the limited bone stock available. Fractures often affect the neck of the femur and the trochanteric region, and in rare cases there is involvement of the subtrochanteric region. Our review confirms this trend and raises the question as to which method of synthesis is ideal for a fracture pattern so rarely described in the literature.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemoral FracturesHip FracturesOsteoarthritis, HipPeriprosthetic FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumans

Identifiers

PMID34747388
PMCPMC10523054
OpenAlexW3214155149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.