ArticleBioengineered2021
Study on flow distribution pattern and conductivity of porous media in bioretention cells.
Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the long-term performance of bioretention cell (BRC), a study was undertaken to assess the flow distribution and conductivity. Despite initial conductivity of the original medium being the common predictor of hydraulic performance, most of the BRCs are affected by conductivity variations during actual operation. This happen due to the fact that microbial behavior plays an important role in the conductivity variations. This linkage may occur when bacteria as inert colloids transports between particles and biodegrades dissolved pollutants, either promoting or retarding flow distribution and conductivity in BRC. Flow distribution was determined by numerical simulation and tracer test, and the correlation between conductivity and flow distribution was revealed by conductivity experiment coupled with flow distribution analysis. Results revealed a non-uniform flow distribution in BRC, and seepage flow in submerged zone was virtually impossible push flow. Conductivity had an inversely proportional relationship with hydraulic efficiency where hydraulic efficiency reached the highest value (0.297) under a low hydraulic conductivity (0.000107 m/s, approximately
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.