Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34747132›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2021

Communicating the diagnosis of cancer or depression: Results of a randomized controlled online study using video vignettes.

Franziska Kühne, Henriette Fauth, Destina S Ay-Bryson, Leonie N C Visser, Florian Weck

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Franziska KühneDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9636-5247
Henriette FauthDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Destina S Ay-BrysonDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Leonie N C VisserCenter for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3487-7938
Florian WeckDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
University of Potsdam · DEAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunicating a diagnosis is highly important, yet complex, especially in the context of cancer and mental disorders. The aim was to explore the communication style of an oncologist vs. psychotherapist in an online study.

methodsPatients (N = 136: 65 cancer, 71 depression) were randomly assigned to watch a standardized video vignette with one of two communication styles (empathic vs. unempathic). Outcome measures of affectivity, information recall, communication skills, empathy and trust were applied.

resultsRegardless of diagnosis, empathic communication was associated with the perception of a significantly more empathic (p < 0.001,

conclusionsThe results highlight the importance of empathy while communicating both a diagnosis of cancer and a mental disorder. Further research should focus on the communication of a mental disorder in association with cancer.

Indexed as

Video-Assisted Techniques and ProceduresAdultDepressionFemaleHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsconsultationmental healthoncologypsycho-oncologyskills

Identifiers

PMID34747132
PMCPMC8683534
OpenAlexW3213093743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.