Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34747062›Full record

ReviewInsect molecular biology2022

Research gaps and new insights in the evolution of Drosophila seminal fluid proteins.

Juan Hurtado, Francisca Cunha Almeida, Silvina Anahí Belliard, Santiago Revale, Esteban Hasson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Insect molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene age shapes functional and evolutionary properties of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan HurtadoDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), CABA, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-3477
Francisca Cunha AlmeidaDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), CABA, Argentina.
Silvina Anahí BelliardLaboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Agronómica, IGEAF (INTA), GV-IABIMO (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago RevaleWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-9582
Esteban HassonDepartamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), CABA, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCentre for Human Genetics · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008881/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the striking effects of seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) on females are fairly conserved among Diptera, most SFPs lack detectable homologues among the SFP repertoires of phylogenetically distant species. How such a rapidly changing proteome conserves functions across taxa is a fascinating question. However, this and other pivotal aspects of SFPs' evolution remain elusive because discoveries on these proteins have been mainly restricted to the model Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge on the inter-specific divergence of the SFP repertoire in Drosophila and compile the increasing amount of relevant genomic information from multiple species. Capitalizing on the accumulated knowledge in D. melanogaster, we present novel sets of high-confidence SFP candidates and transcription factors presumptively involved in regulating the expression of SFPs. We also address open questions by performing comparative genomic analyses that failed to support the existence of many conserved SFPs shared by most dipterans and indicated that gene co-option is the most frequent mechanism accounting for the origin of Drosophila SFP-coding genes. We hope our update establishes a starting point to integrate further data and thus widen the understanding of the intricate evolution of these proteins.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterFemaleProteomeSeminal Plasma ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsProteomeSeminal Plasma Proteinsaccessory glandsgene co-optiongene origingene turnoverseminal fluid

Identifiers

PMID34747062
OpenAlexW3212682917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.