Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34747019›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2022

Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress during lockdown due to COVID-19.

Jose A Rodas, Maria F Jara-Rizzo, Ciara M Greene, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Daniel Oleas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Correlates of climate change distress: The difference to general distress.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jose A RodasUniversidad de Guayaquil, Faculty of Psychological Sciences, University of Guayaquil, Cdla. Universitaria Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-0238
Maria F Jara-RizzoUniversidad de Guayaquil, Faculty of Psychological Sciences, University of Guayaquil, Cdla. Universitaria Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-7949
Ciara M GreeneSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8833-9046
Rodrigo Moreta-HerreraPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-5927
Daniel OleasFaculty of Marketing and Comunication, Universidad Ecotec, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-814X
University College Dublin · IEPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · ECUniversidad Ecotec · ECUniversity of Guayaquil · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several governments have implemented strict measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19, such as lockdown measures. However, these measures have brought negative consequences at an individual level by exacerbating the psychological distress caused by the pandemic. We evaluated the role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) on the levels of anxiety and depression during the lockdown in a sample of 663 Spanish-speaking adults, while controlling for variables related to social support, hobbies, seeking information related to COVID-19, perceived risk of infection, time of assessment, number of deaths and contagions during the assessment and age. Using multiple regression analyses with a stepwise model selection procedure, 29% of the variance in anxiety and 38% of the variance of depression were found to be predicted by specific CERS. The impact of CERS on anxiety and depression was moderated by the sex of participants and the time of assessment, indicating that CERS did not have the same protective or harmful effects in all participants and situations. Based on our results, recommendations are provided for improving coping with stressful events where lockdown measures are taken.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emotional RegulationPsychological DistressAdultAnxietyCognitionCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionHumansAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionEmotion regulationLockdown

Identifiers

PMID34747019
PMCPMC8652999
OpenAlexW3214427790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.