Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746974›Full record

ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2021

Decellularized versus cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction during the Ross procedure: a meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.

Adham Ahmed, Sarah Ahmed, Kathryn S Varghese, Dave M Mathew, Roshan Pandey, Dillon O Rogando, Stephanie A Salazar, Peter J Fusco, Kenneth H Levy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Growing Heart Valve Implants for Children.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adham Ahmed *CUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA. aahmed018@citymail.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-8267
Sarah Ahmed *New Dorp High School, New York, NY, USA.
Kathryn S VargheseCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Dave M MathewCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Roshan PandeyCUNY City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Dillon O RogandoCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Stephanie A SalazarCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Peter J FuscoCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Kenneth H LevyCUNY School of Medicine, 1589 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ideal conduit for repair of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) during the Ross procedure remains unclear and has yet to be fully elucidated. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of decellularized versus cryopreserved pulmonary allografts for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure. MAIN BODY: After a comprehensive literature search, studies comparing decellularized and cryopreserved allografts for patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were pooled to perform a pairwise meta-analysis using the random-effects model. Primary outcomes were early mortality and follow-up allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rates and follow-up endocarditis. A total of 4 studies including 1687 patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure were included. A total of 812 patients received a decellularized pulmonary allograft, while 875 received a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. Compared to cryopreserved allografts, the decellularized group showed similar rates of early mortality (odds ratio, 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.41, P = 0.22). At a mean follow-up period of 5.89 years, no significant difference was observed between the two groups for follow-up allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio, 0.65, 95% confidence interval, 0.20-2.14, P = 0.48). Similarly, no difference was seen in reintervention rates (hazard ratio, 0.54, 95% confidence interval, 0.09-3.12, P = 0.49) nor endocarditis (hazard ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.07-1.35, P = 0.12) at a mean follow-up of 4.85 and 5.75 years, respectively.

conclusionsDecellularized and cryopreserved pulmonary allografts are associated with similar postoperative outcomes for RVOT reconstruction during the Ross procedure. Larger propensity-matched and randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate the efficacy of decellularized allografts compared to cryopreserved allografts in the setting of the Ross.

Indexed as

AllograftAortic valveAortic valve replacementDecellularizedHomograftRossRoss-Yacoub

Identifiers

PMID34746974
PMCPMC8572935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.