Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746896›Full record

ArticleWellbeing, space and society2021

Where birds felt louder: The garden as a refuge during COVID-19.

Pauline Marsh, Lucy O Diekmann, Monika Egerer, Brenda Lin, Alessandro Ossola, Jonathan Kingsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellbeing, space and society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Building an Equity-Centered Ecosystem: University of Utah Health as a Microcosm.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 gardening could herald a greener, healthier future.Frontiers in ecology and the environment · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pauline MarshCentre for Rural Health, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Advocate House, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Lucy O DiekmannUniversity of California Cooperative Extension, USA.
Monika EgererDepartment of Life Science Systems, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Brenda LinCSIRO Land & Water, Australia.
Alessandro OssolaUniversity of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jonathan KingsleySchool of Health Sciences and Centre of Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries experienced something of a boom in interest in gardening. Gardens have long been considered as refuges into which we retreat to escape various struggles and challenges. In this study we examine the characteristics and functions of the garden as a refuge during the period of increased garden interest associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of qualitative results about garden experiences from 3,743 survey respondents revealed intertwining garden and emotional geographies. Utilising non-representational and therapeutic landscape theories, we found multifarious and heightened experiences of non-material aspects of gardens; that is, the sensory and emotional aspects. People experienced, for example, a sense of joy, beauty, and reassurance, a greater attunement to the natural world and an increased sense of nature connection than they had at other times: birds

Indexed as

AffectAttunementDomestic natureGardenNon-representational theoryTherapeutic landscapes

Identifiers

PMID34746896
PMCPMC8562863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.