ArticleResuscitation plus2021
Chest compressions become deeper when pushing with forward lean: A simulation study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of forward-leaning cardiopulmonary resuscitation on chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- The dramatic increase in sudden cardiac deaths and the alarming low survival: A global call to action to improve outcome with the engagement of tertiary education system.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimChest compression depth (CCD) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation is important. However, lightweight rescuers have difficulty achieving an appropriate depth. Chest compression force (CCFORCE) can be increased by placing the arms at 100° to the patient's frontal plane. In a simulation manikin study, we compared the CCD at 90° and 100° among lightweight Asian females and hypothesized that the CCD would be greater when the arms were placed at 100°.
methodsWe included 35 lightweight female students from Shimane University who performed compressions 30 times each at 90° and 100°. The CCFORCE and CCD and the residual force on the chest wall during decompression for each chest compression were compared using CPRmeter-2.
resultsOf the 35 participants, 3 were excluded because their angles deviated from the prescribed angle. Thirty-two participants were categorized according to CCD at 90°: ≤40 mm (group 1), 41-49 mm (group 2), and ≥ 50 mm (group 3). The overall mean CCD increased from 90° to 100° (44.3 ± 8.2 mm vs. 48.1 ± 7.2 mm; p < 0.05). The mean CCD changes between 90° and 100° were 34.4 ± 4.7 mm vs. 42.9 ± 4.8 mm (p < 0.05) in group 1, 44.9 ± 2.5 mm vs. 47.0 ± 4.2 mm (p = 0.17) in group 2, and 53.0 ± 2.7 mm vs. 55.4 ± 5.6 mm (p < 0.05) in group 3. The residual force was greater when the chest compression angle was 100°.
conclusionCCD can be increased for lightweight rescuers when using a forward leaning position of 100° to the frontal plane of the patient. Further research is required to obtain more realistic situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.