ArticleJTCVS open2021
Clinical potential of angiogenic therapy and cellular reprogramming.
Article in JTCVS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineering Human Tissues and the Future of Vascular Replacement.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Article
- Commentary: Cardiac cellular "time travel" to when it was bouncing.JTCVS open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
You're driving along the freeway during rush hour. You're running late and find yourself in bumper-to-bumper traffic. You have 3 options: (1) do nothing, suffer with anguish inside; (2) find productive ways to pass the time, like listen to a podcast or talk on the phone; or (3) get off on the next exit and find an alternative, roundabout path to your destination. Similarly, patients suffering from coronary artery disease can opt to do nothing; stop progression and treat their symptoms with medical therapy; or undergo revascularization either percutaneously or surgically. There are few options, however, for those who develop chronic coronary artery disease without suitable revascularization strategies. They have missed their exit and are stuck in this metaphorical traffic jam, with no radio and no cell phone. These patients may experience refractory angina or develop ischemic cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Exploring solutions to this increasingly widespread problem is imperative. Chronic heart failure is rising, while the number of organs available for transplantation remains limited. Similarly, bridge therapies such as ventricular assist devices are resource intensive and are typically only performed at select, high-volume institutions. In the following article, the authors explore cardiac regenerative strategies to bridge this therapeutic gap. They delve into a so-called "biologic bypass," which aims to restore perfusion and functionality of ischemic myocardium. Specifically, they review published preclinical data and the potential clinical implementation of cardiac reprogramming of fibrotic tissue into functioning, contractile myocardium, as well as angiogenic therapies aimed at inducing angiogenesis. These innovative and forward-thinking approaches will be necessary to combat the challenges faced by the heart specialists of tomorrow.w Jordan Dozier, MD, and Nahush A. Mokadam, MD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.