Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746791›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2021

Binding the Acoustic Features of an Auditory Source through Temporal Coherence.

Mohsen Rezaeizadeh, Shihab Shamma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohsen RezaeizadehDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-1110
Shihab ShammaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-6804

Funding

Spectro-Temporal Plasticity in Primary Auditory CortexR01DC005779 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Shihab A Shamma · 2004 to 2026
$6.7M
Neural Correlates of Streaming of Complex SoundsR01DC007657 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHAMMA, SHIHAB A · 2006 to 2015
$3.8M
Neural Correlates of Streaming of Complex SoundsR01DC016119 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHAMMA, SHIHAB A · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Multiscale modeling of the cocktail party problemU01AG058532 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
CRCNS: Auditory Stream Segregation and the Cocktail Party ProblemR01AG027573 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHAMMA, SHIHAB A · 2005 to 2007
$627k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027573NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058532NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005779NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007657NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have suggested that the perception of a target sound stream (or source) can only be segregated from a complex acoustic background mixture if the acoustic features underlying its perceptual attributes (e.g., pitch, location, and timbre) induce temporally modulated responses that are mutually correlated (or coherent), and that are uncorrelated (incoherent) from those of other sources in the mixture. This "temporal coherence" hypothesis asserts that attentive listening to one acoustic feature of a target enhances brain responses to that feature but would also concomitantly (1) induce mutually excitatory influences with other coherently responding neurons, thus enhancing (or binding) them all as they respond to the attended source; by contrast, (2) suppressive interactions are hypothesized to build up among neurons driven by temporally incoherent sound features, thus relatively reducing their activity. In this study, we report on EEG measurements in human subjects engaged in various sound segregation tasks that demonstrate rapid binding among the temporally coherent features of the attended source regardless of their identity (pure tone components, tone complexes, or noise), harmonic relationship, or frequency separation, thus confirming the key role temporal coherence plays in the analysis and organization of auditory scenes.

Indexed as

AttentionCocktail PartyEEGSource SegregationTemporal Coherence

Identifiers

PMID34746791
PMCPMC8567849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.