ArticleMetabolism open2021
Real world evidence: Patients with refractory pemphigus treated with Rituximab.
Article in Metabolism open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Pemphigus Foliaceus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Pemphigus relapse: Mechanisms, risk factors, and agents associated with disease recurrence.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Review
- Understanding the enigmatic association between mycosis fungoides and psoriasis: Report of two cases and review of the literature.Metabolism open · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases, potentially life-threatening. Rituximab received FDA approval in June 2018 for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with pemphigus, resistant to previous therapies or unable to receive classic immunosuppressive treatment due to serious adverse events or comorbidities. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-five patients (9 men, 16 women), mean age 49.4 ± 15.9 years (range 21-74 years), mean disease duration 4 ± 2.7 years (range 0.25-10 years) were included in the study: 19 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 6 with pemphigus foliaceous. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated according to the control of disease, retention of remission, disease severity, previous treatments and adverse reactions. During COVID-19 pandemic patients are monitored closely through tele-dermatology.
resultsTwenty-three out of 25 patients had great improvement, 2 out of 25 ceased therapy due to adverse events (arthralgias and dyspnea). Sixteen out of 23 received additional course after 8 months (range 5-60 months). More aged patients presented more frequently adverse events and underwent additional courses (p = 0.002). Rituximab was found superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment in terms of efficacy and safety, with larger periods of remission and lower doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. No major adverse events were noticed.
conclusionsRituximab is a very effective treatment of pemphigus and, remarkably, superior to classic immunosuppressive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.