Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746725›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Long-term persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses after infection and estimates of the duration of protection.

Eric Hy Lau, David Sc Hui, Owen Ty Tsang, Wai-Hung Chan, Mike Yw Kwan, Susan S Chiu, Samuel Ms Cheng, Ronald Lw Ko, John Kc Li, Sara Chaothai and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric Hy LauSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
David Sc HuiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
Owen Ty TsangInfectious Diseases Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Wai-Hung ChanDepartment of Paediatrics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Mike Yw KwanDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Susan S ChiuDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong and Queen Mary Hospital, Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Samuel Ms ChengSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Ronald Lw KoSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
John Kc LiSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Sara ChaothaiSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Chi H TsangSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Leo Lm PoonSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
Malik PeirisSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKHospital Authority · HKHKU-Pasteur Research Pole · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe duration of immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infected people remains unclear. Neutralizing antibody responses are the best available correlate of protection against re-infection. Recent studies estimated that the correlate of 50% protection from re-infection was 20% of the mean convalescent neutralizing antibody titre.

methodsWe collected sera from a cohort of 124 individuals with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections from Prince of Wales Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Queen Mary Hospitals of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong, for periods up to 386 days after symptom onset and tested these for antibody to SARS-CoV-2 using 50% virus plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT

findingsBecause the rate of antibody waning slows with time, we fitted lines of decay to 115 sera from 62 patients collected beyond 90 days after symptom onset and estimate that PRNT

interpretationThe data suggest that symptomatic COVID-19 disease is followed by relatively long-lived protection from re-infection by antigenically similar viruses.

fundingHealth and Medical Research Fund, Commissioned research on Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) (Reference Nos. COVID190126 and COVID1903003) from the Food and Health Bureau and the Theme-based Research Scheme project no. T11-712/19-N, the University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong SAR Government.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Immunity, durationKineticsNeutralizing antibodyProtectionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34746725
PMCPMC8556690
OpenAlexW3180766444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.