ArticleEnvironmental research communications2021
Wetland restoration yields dynamic nitrate responses across the Upper Mississippi river basin.
Article in Environmental research communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Prediction and Interpretation of Riverine Nitrate Export Across the Mississippi River Basin.Water resources research · 2025Article
- Wetland-mediated nitrate reductions attenuate downstream: Insights from a modeling study.Journal of environmental management · 2024Article
- Implementing constructed wetlands for nutrient reduction at watershed scale: Opportunity to link models and real-world execution.Journal of soil and water conservation · 2024Article
- Article
- Improving ecosystem health in highly altered river basins: a generalized framework and its application to the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin.Frontiers in environmental science · 2024Article
- Our national nutrient reduction needs: Applying a conservation prioritization framework to US agricultural lands.Journal of environmental management · 2024Article
- US climate policy yields water quality cobenefits in the Mississippi Basin and Gulf of Mexico.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Mapping global non-floodplain wetlands.Earth system science data · 2023Article
- River Basin Simulations Reveal Wide-Ranging Wetland-Mediated Nitrate Reductions.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Dynamics of streamflow permanence in a headwater network: Insights from catchment-scale model simulations.Journal of hydrology · 2023Article
- Headwater streams and inland wetlands: Status and advancements of geospatial datasets and maps across the United States.Earth-science reviews · 2022Article
- Vulnerable Waters are Essential to Watershed Resilience.Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Wetland restoration is a primary management option for removing surplus nitrogen draining from agricultural landscapes. However, wetland capacity to mitigate nitrogen losses at large river-basin scales remains uncertain. This is largely due to a limited number of studies that address the cumulative and dynamic effects of restored wetlands across the landscape on downstream nutrient conditions. We analyzed wetland restoration impacts on modeled nitrate dynamics across 279 subbasins comprising the ∼0.5 million km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.