ArticleACS omega2021
Application of Multivariate Methods to Evaluate Differential Material Attributes of HPMC from Different Sources.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Versatility and Sustainability of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) in Modern Chemical Industry.Polymers · 2026Review
- Thermochromic polysaccharide-based materials and their smart applications.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Tetrahydropyridine Analogues as Potent Antibiofilm Agents againstACS omega · 2026Article
- Study on the Physical Properties and Application of a Novel Pharmaceutical Excipient Made from Starch and Cellulose Co-Processing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Establishment and Validation of a Transdermal Drug Delivery System for the Anti-Depressant Drug Citalopram Hydrobromide.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Powder and Tableting Properties of Regular and Direct Compression Hypromellose from Different Vendors.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to achieve differential material attributes (DMAs) of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) with different viscosity grades (K4M, K15M, and K100M) from different manufacturers (Anhui Shanhe and Dow Chemical). Two kinds of multivariate methods, principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), were adopted. The physicochemical properties of HPMC were systematically investigated via various techniques (e.g., SEM, particle size detection, and SeDeM characterization). Data from 33 characterization variables were applied to the multivariate methods. The PCA and OPLS-DA results indicated the differences between the HPMC from two manufacturers by the common variables that include the tablet hardness (HD), tensile strength (TS), bulk density, interparticle porosity, Carr index, cohesion index, Hausner ratio, flowability, and the width of the particle size distribution (span). Interestingly, these variables showed a certain correlation with each other, supporting the characterization results. Except for these different variables of the HPMC obtained by multivariate analysis results, distinguishable shapes and surface morphologies also appeared between different sources. To sum up, the powder properties (particle size, surface topography, dimension, flowability, and compressibility) and the tablet properties (HD and TS) were recognized as the DMAs of HPMC samples. This work provided the multivariate methods for the physicochemical characterization of HPMC, with potential in the quality control and formulation development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.