Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746525›Full record

ReviewCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Prospects for anti-

Sanaz Ahmadipour, Robert A Field, Gavin J Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Compromising UDP-sugar nucleotide biosynthesis attenuatesCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antibacterial Properties of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles (Review).International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Transcriptional Reprogramming ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaccines · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanaz AhmadipourDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Robert A FieldDepartment of Chemistry and Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Gavin J MillerLennard-Jones Laboratory, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
Keele University · GBNorwich Research Park · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9790Medical Research Council MR/T019522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of fungal infections on humans is a serious public health issue that has received much less attention than bacterial infection and treatment, despite ever-increasing incidence exacerbated by an increased incidence of immunocompromised individuals in the population.

Indexed as

ChitinFungal cell wallGlycoproteinsInhibitorsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34746525
PMCPMC8551693
OpenAlexW3205430356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.