Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746498›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2021

Risk for Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Serially Positive Fecal Immunochemistry Test in an Annual Screening Program.

Takuji Kawamura, Kana Amamiya, Naonori Inoue, Naokuni Sakiyama, Yusuke Okada, Kasumi Sanada, Mai Kamaguchi, Kenichi Nishioji, Kiyohito Tanaka, Koji Uno and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Takuji KawamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kana AmamiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naonori InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Naokuni SakiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kasumi SanadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Mai KamaguchiDepartment of Health Care, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenichi NishiojiDepartment of Health Care, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiyohito TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji UnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenjiro YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Red Cross Hospital · GRKrankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are patients who do not undergo colonoscopy even if the fecal immunochemistry test (FIT) results are positive and even with repeated positive test results the following year. We aimed to investigate colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in examinees with positive FIT results in our annual screening program.

methodsWe analyzed patients who underwent initial colonoscopy from April 2010 to March 2017 because of positive FIT results using an endoscopy database in our hospital. We investigated the difference in the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia as a surrogate marker of CRC between those who had an initial positive test and those who had repeated positive tests.

resultsA total of 748 patients were included in this analysis. The advanced neoplasia detection rates were 7.6% (50/656) and 18.5% (17/92) for the initial and repeated positive test groups, respectively. Subgroup analysis of those with repeated positive tests revealed that the detection rates in examinees with positive tests 1-2 and >2 years ago were 16.7% (6/36) and 19.6% (11/56), respectively. The odds ratios for advanced neoplasia detection in patients with positive tests 1-2 and >2 years ago compared with those in the initial positive test group were 2.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-7.10) and 3.09 (95% CI, 1.47-6.48), respectively.

conclusionsThe risk of CRC appears more than doubled in patients with a repeated positive FIT result. Prompt colonoscopy is recommended for FIT-positive cases.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcolonic neoplasmscolonoscopycolorectal neoplasmsoccult blood

Identifiers

PMID34746498
PMCPMC8553357
OpenAlexW3208767238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.