Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745752›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Hybrid FPGA-CPU pupil tracker.

Bartlomiej Kowalski, Xiaojing Huang, Samuel Steven, Alfredo Dubra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Embedded CPU-GPU pupil tracking.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bartlomiej KowalskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-6724
Xiaojing HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-985X
Samuel StevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2550-9340
Alfredo DubraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-9020
Stanford University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Improving rigor and reproducibility in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopyR01EY031360 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
Axially-resolved Spectroscopic Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY025231 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Low Latency Eye-Motion CompensationR01EY032669 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Development, Validation and Application of Metabolic Imaging in GlaucomaR01EY028287 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO, GOLDBERG, JEFFREY L · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025231NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028287NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032669NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An off-axis monocular pupil tracker designed for eventual integration in ophthalmoscopes for eye movement stabilization is described and demonstrated. The instrument consists of light-emitting diodes, a camera, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) and a central processing unit (CPU). The raw camera image undergoes background subtraction, field-flattening, 1-dimensional low-pass filtering, thresholding and robust pupil edge detection on an FPGA pixel stream, followed by least-squares fitting of the pupil edge pixel coordinates to an ellipse in the CPU. Experimental data suggest that the proposed algorithms require raw images with a minimum of ∼32 gray levels to achieve sub-pixel pupil center accuracy. Tests with two different cameras operating at 575, 1250 and 5400 frames per second trained on a model pupil achieved 0.5-1.5 μm pupil center estimation precision with 0.6-2.1 ms combined image download, FPGA and CPU processing latency. Pupil tracking data from a fixating human subject show that the tracker operation only requires the adjustment of a single parameter, namely an image intensity threshold. The latency of the proposed pupil tracker is limited by camera download time (latency) and sensitivity (precision).

Identifiers

PMID34745752
PMCPMC8548015
OpenAlexW3199022434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.