Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745737›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Artifact removal in photoacoustic tomography with an unsupervised method.

Mengyang Lu, Xin Liu, Chengcheng Liu, Boyi Li, Wenting Gu, Jiehui Jiang, Dean Ta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengyang LuSchool of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Xin LiuAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-2630
Chengcheng LiuAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-6439
Boyi LiAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-9730
Wenting GuSchool of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Jiehui JiangSchool of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Dean TaAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Fudan University · CNShanghai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is an emerging biomedical imaging technology that can realize high contrast imaging with a penetration depth of the acoustic. Recently, deep learning (DL) methods have also been successfully applied to PAT for improving the image reconstruction quality. However, the current DL-based PAT methods are implemented by the supervised learning strategy, and the imaging performance is dependent on the available ground-truth data. To overcome the limitation, this work introduces a new image domain transformation method based on cyclic generative adversarial network (CycleGAN), termed as PA-GAN, which is used to remove artifacts in PAT images caused by the use of the limited-view measurement data in an unsupervised learning way. A series of data from phantom and

Identifiers

PMID34745737
PMCPMC8548009
OpenAlexW3200844070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.