Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745714›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Most favorable stimulation duration in the sensorimotor cortex for fNIRS-based BCI.

M N Afzal Khan, Keum-Shik Hong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M N Afzal KhanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Keum-Shik HongSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Pusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary objectives of the brain-computer interface (BCI) is to obtain a command with higher classification accuracy within the shortest possible time duration. Therefore, this study evaluates several stimulation durations to propose a duration that can yield the highest classification accuracy. Furthermore, this study aims to address the inherent delay in the hemodynamic responses (HRs) for the command generation time. To this end, HRs in the sensorimotor cortex were evaluated for the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based BCI. To evoke brain activity, right-hand-index finger poking and tapping tasks were used. In this study, six different stimulation durations (i.e., 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15 s) were tested on 10 healthy male subjects. Upon stimulation, different temporal features and multiple time windows were utilized to extract temporal features. The extracted features were then classified using linear discriminant analysis. The classification results using the main HR showed that a 5 s stimulation duration could yield the highest classification accuracy, i.e., 74%, with a combination of the mean and maximum value features. However, the results were not significantly different from the classification accuracy obtained using the 15 s stimulation. To further validate the results, a classification using the initial dip was performed. The results obtained endorsed the finding with an average classification accuracy of 73.5% using the features of minimum peak and skewness in the 5 s window. The results based on classification using the initial dip for 5 s were significantly different from all other tested stimulation durations (

Identifiers

PMID34745714
PMCPMC8547991
OpenAlexW3195581831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.