ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Most favorable stimulation duration in the sensorimotor cortex for fNIRS-based BCI.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of transcranial alternating current stimulation on psychological stress: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Prefrontal fNIRS hemodynamic correlates of attentional load during rapid serial visual presentation tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring Effects of Mental Stress with Data Augmentation and Classification Using fNIRS.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic activity is not parsimoniously tuned to index-of-difficulty in movement with dual requirements on speed-accuracy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- CGAN-rIRN: a data-augmented deep learning approach to accurate classification of mental tasks for a fNIRS-based brain-computer interface.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Benchmarking framework for machine learning classification from fNIRS data.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2023Article
- A Potential Prognosis Indicator Based on P300 Brain-Computer Interface for Patients with Disorder of Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Applying antagonistic activation pattern to the single-trial classification of mental arithmetic.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Acupuncture enhances brain function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: evidence from a functional-near infrared spectroscopy study.Neural regeneration research · 2022Article
- A pediatric near-infrared spectroscopy brain-computer interface based on the detection of emotional valence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Classification of Individual Finger Movements from Right Hand Using fNIRS Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the primary objectives of the brain-computer interface (BCI) is to obtain a command with higher classification accuracy within the shortest possible time duration. Therefore, this study evaluates several stimulation durations to propose a duration that can yield the highest classification accuracy. Furthermore, this study aims to address the inherent delay in the hemodynamic responses (HRs) for the command generation time. To this end, HRs in the sensorimotor cortex were evaluated for the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based BCI. To evoke brain activity, right-hand-index finger poking and tapping tasks were used. In this study, six different stimulation durations (i.e., 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15 s) were tested on 10 healthy male subjects. Upon stimulation, different temporal features and multiple time windows were utilized to extract temporal features. The extracted features were then classified using linear discriminant analysis. The classification results using the main HR showed that a 5 s stimulation duration could yield the highest classification accuracy, i.e., 74%, with a combination of the mean and maximum value features. However, the results were not significantly different from the classification accuracy obtained using the 15 s stimulation. To further validate the results, a classification using the initial dip was performed. The results obtained endorsed the finding with an average classification accuracy of 73.5% using the features of minimum peak and skewness in the 5 s window. The results based on classification using the initial dip for 5 s were significantly different from all other tested stimulation durations (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.