ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Segmentation of Gastric Computerized Tomography Images under Intelligent Algorithms in Evaluation of Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Paclitaxel in Treatment of Gastric Cancer.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Retracted: Segmentation of Gastric Computerized Tomography Images under Intelligent Algorithms in Evaluation of Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Paclitaxel in Treatment of Gastric Cancer.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze the evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithm combined with gastric computed tomography (CT) image in clinical chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, 112 patients with advanced gastric cancer were selected as the research object. Among which, 56 patients in the experimental group received paclitaxel (PTX) combined with decitabine sequential decitabine maintenance therapy. Fifty-six patients in the control group received first-line treatment with decitabine combined with cisplatin. The image segmentation algorithm based on fast interactive dictionary selection was used to process gastric CT images. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) after treatment were recorded. The true-positive rate (TPR) and coincidence ratio (CR) of the proposed algorithm for image segmentation were significantly higher than those of the mean shift algorithm and the iCoseg algorithm. The mean edge distance (MED) and edge distance variance (EDV) were significantly lower than the mean shift algorithm and the iCoseg algorithm, and the differences were considerable (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.