Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745490›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

The Way of Severe Nursing of Respiratory System Failure.

Qiongshan Liu, Weichao Li

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiongshan LiuThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weichao LiThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-5985
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory failure is the most common clinical symptom, seriously endangering people's health, which is mainly caused by a series of reasons, leading to serious respiratory dysfunction and severe pulmonary respiratory disorders, damaging the pulmonary airway function, and causing disability to maintain normal human gas exchange activities. At present, the main treatment of respiratory failure is to use the ventilator to help patients exchange gas and keep their breathing unobstructed. The nursing method is also around the artificial airway mechanical ventilation. The nursing of patients with respiratory failure is mainly respiratory nursing and psychological nursing. In this paper, the main research is to explore the way of severe nursing of respiratory failure. Before the nursing of respiratory failure, we should carry out nursing detection of the ventilator and test its performance, tightness, pipeline safety, and airway patency. Then carrying on the respiratory failure mechanical ventilation nursing and clarifying its mechanical ventilation nursing process is the main work of intensive care, at the same time, giving consideration to the psychological nursing of respiratory failure and implementing comprehensive nursing. In this paper, 50 patients were selected and divided into group A and group B; group A was given comprehensive nursing, and group B was given general nursing. The experimental results show that a series of situations in group A are more optimistic than those in group B. There was no doubt that the PH value of the two groups changed significantly 6 months after discharge. The pO

Indexed as

Respiratory InsufficiencyCritical CareHumansLungRespirationRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID34745490
PMCPMC8570877
OpenAlexW3209293240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.