Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745481›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic reviews2021

Treatment of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome.

Joseph D Leider, Olivia C Derise, Kyle A Bourdreaux, Gregor J Dierks, Christopher Lee, Giustino Varrassi, William F Sherman, Alan D Kaye

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph D LeiderGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC.
Olivia C DeriseLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.
Kyle A BourdreauxLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.
Gregor J DierksLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.
Christopher LeeCreighton University School Of Medicine-Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ.
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Foundation, Via Tacito 7, Rome, Italy.
William F ShermanTulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA.
Alan D KayeLouisiana State University Shreveport, LA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USCreighton University · USFondazione Roma · ITGeorgetown University · USLouisiana State University in Shreveport · USTulane Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome (SNES) is an often-overlooked etiology of shoulder pain and weakness. Treatment varies depending on the location and etiology of entrapment, which can be described as compressive or traction lesions. In some cases, treating the primary cause of impingement (ie. rotator cuff tear, ganglion cyst, etc.) is sufficient to relieve pressure on the nerve. In other cases where impingement is caused by dynamic microtrauma (as seen in overhead athletes and laborers), treatment is often more conservative. Conservative first-line therapy includes rehabilitation programs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and lifestyle modification. Physical therapy is targeted at strengthening the rotator cuff muscles, trapezius, levator scapulae, rhomboids, serratus anterior, and deltoid muscle(s). If non-operative treatment fails to relieve suprascapular neuropathy, minimally invasive treatment options exist, such as suprascapular nerve injection, neurostimulation, cryoneurolysis, and pulsed radiofrequency. Multiple treatment modalities are often used synergistically due to variations in shoulder anatomy, physiology, pain response, and pathology as a sole therapeutic option does not seem successful for all cases. Often patients can be treated with non-invasive measures alone; however, injuries refractory to conservative treatment may require either arthroscopic or open surgery, particularly if the patient has an identifiable and reversible cause of nerve compression. Indications for invasive treatment include, but are not limited to, refractory to non-operative treatment, have a space-occupying lesion, or show severe signs and symptoms of muscle atrophy. Open decompression has fallen out of favor due to the advantages inherent in the less invasive arthroscopic approach.

Indexed as

arthroscopicnerve entrapmentsuprascapular nerve entrapment

Identifiers

PMID34745481
PMCPMC8567757
OpenAlexW3184817686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.