ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2021
Amplifying influence through coordinated behaviour in social networks.
Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coordinated link sharing on Facebook.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- X under Musk's leadership: Substantial hate and no reduction in inauthentic activity.PloS one · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of coordinated online behavior: Stability, archetypes, and influence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The efficacy of Facebook's vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the COVID-19 pandemic.Science advances · 2023Article
- Do you hear the people sing? Comparison of synchronized URL and narrative themes in 2020 and 2023 French protests.Frontiers in big data · 2023Article
- A combined synchronization index for evaluating collective action social media.Applied network science · 2023Article
- Promoting and countering misinformation during Australia's 2019-2020 bushfires: a case study of polarisation.Social network analysis and mining · 2022Article
- How coordinated link sharing behavior and partisans' narrative framing fan the spread of COVID-19 misinformation and conspiracy theories.Social network analysis and mining · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Political misinformation, astroturfing and organised trolling are online malicious behaviours with significant real-world effects that rely on making the voices of the few sounds like the roar of the many. These are especially dangerous when they influence democratic systems and government policy. Many previous approaches examining these phenomena have focused on identifying campaigns rather than the small groups responsible for instigating or sustaining them. To reveal latent (i.e. hidden) networks of cooperating accounts, we propose a novel temporal window approach that can rely on account interactions and metadata alone. It detects groups of accounts engaging in various behaviours that, in concert, come to execute different goal-based amplification strategies, a number of which we describe, alongside other inauthentic strategies from the literature. The approach relies upon a pipeline that extracts relevant elements from social media posts common to the major platforms, infers connections between accounts based on criteria matching the coordination strategies to build an undirected weighted network of accounts, which is then mined for communities exhibiting high levels of evidence of coordination using a novel community extraction method. We address the temporal aspect of the data by using a windowing mechanism, which may be suitable for near real-time application. We further highlight consistent coordination with a sliding frame across multiple windows and application of a decay factor. Our approach is compared with other recent similar processing approaches and community detection methods and is validated against two politically relevant Twitter datasets with ground truth data, using content, temporal, and network analyses, as well as with the design, training and application of three one-class classifiers built using the ground truth; its utility is furthermore demonstrated in two case studies of contentious online discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.