ArticleRheuma plus2021
[COVID-19 in Routine Rheumatologic Care].
Article in Rheuma plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the first case of coronavirus infection with SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and the associated COVID-19 (corona virus disease 2019) it has become a worldwide pandemic. This leads to persistent and far-reaching consequences for the health system and society as a whole. Our patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were initially considered to be at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV‑2, especially if they were on immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory therapy (DMARD). It was assumed that a severe COVID-19 course could occur in case of infection. Although PCR diagnosis is generally considered the gold standard for early diagnosis of active infection with SARS-CoV‑2, it has been shown that it should not always be used to confirm the diagnosis of COVID-19. Therefore, complementary antibody testing for SARS-CoV‑2 could be useful in cases of clinical suspicion and negative PCR for diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19, even retrospectively. Apparently, patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease and under DMARD therapy are not particularly at risk in case of SARS-CoV‑2 infection. Whether this is due to better hygiene measures or increased contact restrictions of patients with underlying inflammatory rheumatic disease, or whether ongoing DMARD therapy offers some protection against a severe course of COVID-19, is still to be clarified. The important questions about the tolerability and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination have yet to be answered. In summary, there is still a clear need for research to better advise our patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.