Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745214›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Optimizing Sequencing Resources in Genotyped Livestock Populations Using Linear Programming.

Hao Cheng, Keyu Xu, Jinghui Li, Kuruvilla Joseph Abraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Keyu XuDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Jinghui LiDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Kuruvilla Joseph AbrahamDepartment of Economics, FEARP, University of São-Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-cost genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are routinely used in animal breeding programs. Compared to SNP arrays, the use of whole-genome sequence data generated by the next-generation sequencing technologies (NGS) has great potential in livestock populations. However, sequencing a large number of animals to exploit the full potential of whole-genome sequence data is not feasible. Thus, novel strategies are required for the allocation of sequencing resources in genotyped livestock populations such that the entire population can be imputed, maximizing the efficiency of whole genome sequencing budgets. We present two applications of linear programming for the efficient allocation of sequencing resources. The first application is to identify the minimum number of animals for sequencing subject to the criterion that each haplotype in the population is contained in at least one of the animals selected for sequencing. The second application is the selection of animals whose haplotypes include the largest possible proportion of common haplotypes present in the population, assuming a limited sequencing budget. Both applications are available in an open source program LPChoose. In both applications, LPChoose has similar or better performance than some other methods suggesting that linear programming methods offer great potential for the efficient allocation of sequencing resources. The utility of these methods can be increased through the development of improved heuristics.

Indexed as

dairy cattlehaplotypeslinear programmingselectionsequencing

Identifiers

PMID34745214
PMCPMC8570094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.