Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745204›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021

Development and Implementation of In-House Pharmacogenomic Testing Program at a Major Academic Health System.

Pawel Mroz, Stephen Michel, Josiah D Allen, Tim Meyer, Erin J McGonagle, Rachel Carpentier, Alexandra Vecchia, Allyson Schlichte, Jeffrey R Bishop, Henry M Dunnenberger and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Strategies for DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the US.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pawel MrozDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Stephen MichelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Josiah D AllenDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Tim MeyerInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Erin J McGonagleDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rachel CarpentierFairview Pharmacy Services, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Alexandra VecchiaFairview Pharmacy Services, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Allyson SchlichteFairview Pharmacy Services, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jeffrey R BishopDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Henry M DunnenbergerMark R Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine Center, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States.
Sophia YoheDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Bharat ThyagarajanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Pamala A JacobsonDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Steven G JohnsonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) studies how a person's genes affect the response to medications and is quickly becoming a significant part of precision medicine. The clinical application of PGx principles has consistently been cited as a major opportunity for improving therapeutic outcomes. Several recent studies have demonstrated that most individuals (> 90%) harbor PGx variants that would be clinically actionable if prescribed a medication relevant to that gene. In multiple well-conducted studies, the results of PGx testing have been shown to guide therapy choice and dosing modifications which improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Although the value of PGx testing is evident, its successful implementation in a clinical setting presents a number of challenges to molecular diagnostic laboratories, healthcare systems, providers and patients. Different molecular methods can be applied to identify PGx variants and the design of the assay is therefore extremely important. Once the genotyping results are available the biggest technical challenge lies in turning this complex genetic information into phenotypes and actionable recommendations that a busy clinician can effectively utilize to provide better medical care, in a cost-effective, efficient and reliable manner. In this paper we describe a successful and highly collaborative implementation of the PGx testing program at the University of Minnesota and MHealth Fairview Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory and selected Pharmacies and Clinics. We offer detailed descriptions of the necessary components of the pharmacogenomic testing implementation, the development and technical validation of the in-house SNP based multiplex PCR based assay targeting 20 genes and 48 SNPs as well as a separate CYP2D6 copy number assay along with the process of PGx report design, results of the provider and pharmacists usability studies, and the development of the software tool for genotype-phenotype translation and gene-phenotype-drug CPIC-based recommendations. Finally, we outline the process of developing the clinical workflow that connects the providers with the PGx experts within the Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory and the Pharmacy.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportclinical implementationgenetic variationpersonalized medicinePGxpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34745204
PMCPMC8564018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.