Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34745171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

A Semi-Automated SNP-Based Approach for Contaminant Identification in Biparental Polyploid Populations of Tropical Forage Grasses.

Felipe Bitencourt Martins, Aline Costa Lima Moraes, Alexandre Hild Aono, Rebecca Caroline Ulbricht Ferreira, Lucimara Chiari, Rosangela Maria Simeão, Sanzio Carvalho Lima Barrios, Mateus Figueiredo Santos, Liana Jank, Cacilda Borges do Valle and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging technologies and current challenges in intratumoral microbiota research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in genomic characterization of Urochloa humidicola: exploring polyploid inheritance and apomixis.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felipe Bitencourt MartinsCenter for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Costa Lima MoraesCenter for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Hild AonoCenter for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rebecca Caroline Ulbricht FerreiraCenter for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucimara ChiariEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Rosangela Maria SimeãoEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Sanzio Carvalho Lima BarriosEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Mateus Figueiredo SantosEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Liana JankEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Cacilda Borges do ValleEmbrapa Gado de Corte, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Bianca Baccili Zanotto VignaEmbrapa Pecuária Sudeste, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anete Pereira de SouzaCenter for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial hybridization plays a fundamental role in plant breeding programs since it generates new genotypic combinations that can result in desirable phenotypes. Depending on the species and mode of reproduction, controlled crosses may be challenging, and contaminating individuals can be introduced accidentally. In this context, the identification of such contaminants is important to avoid compromising further selection cycles, as well as genetic and genomic studies. The main objective of this work was to propose an automated multivariate methodology for the detection and classification of putative contaminants, including apomictic clones (ACs), self-fertilized individuals, half-siblings (HSs), and full contaminants (FCs), in biparental polyploid progenies of tropical forage grasses. We established a pipeline to identify contaminants in genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data encoded as allele dosages of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers by integrating principal component analysis (PCA), genotypic analysis (GA) measures based on Mendelian segregation, and clustering analysis (CA). The combination of these methods allowed for the correct identification of all contaminants in all simulated progenies and the detection of putative contaminants in three real progenies of tropical forage grasses, providing an easy and promising methodology for the identification of contaminants in biparental progenies of tetraploid and hexaploid species. The proposed pipeline was made available through the polyCID Shiny app and can be easily coupled with traditional genetic approaches, such as linkage map construction, thereby increasing the efficiency of breeding programs.

Indexed as

allele dosageapomictic clonesclustering analysisGBShalf-siblingprincipal component analysisself-fertilizationshiny

Identifiers

PMID34745171
PMCPMC8569613
OpenAlexW3206787299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.