ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Comparative Genome Analysis of the Genus
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Groundwater microbial community structure under contrasting hydrological conditions in a sulfate-rich karst aquifer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Wastewater Treatment with Bacterial Representatives of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Genomic and morphological characterization of a new Thiothrix species from a sulfide hot spring of the Zmeinaya bay (Northern Baikal, Russia).Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2024Article
- Article
- Metagenomics Revealed a New Genus 'International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of floc characteristics and microbial communities in anoxic and aerobic suspended growth processes.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2022Article
- History of the Study of the GenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Two New Species of Filamentous Sulfur Bacteria of the GenusMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two strains of filamentous, colorless sulfur bacteria were isolated from bacterial fouling in the outflow of hydrogen sulfide-containing waters from a coal mine (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.