Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34744869›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Psychotherapy Dropout: Using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set to Explore the Early In-Session Process of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.

Hanne Gotaas Fredum, Felicitas Rost, Randi Ulberg, Nick Midgley, Agneta Thorén, Julie Fredrikke Dalen Aker, Hanna Fam Johansen, Lena Sandvand, Lina Tosterud, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychotherapy, artificial intelligence and adolescents: ethical aspects.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanne Gotaas FredumDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Felicitas RostPortman Clinic, The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Randi UlbergDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nick MidgleyAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, The Kantor Centre of Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
Agneta ThorénThe Erica Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
Julie Fredrikke Dalen AkerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hanna Fam JohansenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lena SandvandDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lina TosterudDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne-Sofie Johnsen DahlDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOAnna Freud Centre · GBDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOThe Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research suggests that short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) is an effective treatment for depression in adolescence, yet treatment dropout is a major concern and what leads to dropout is poorly understood. Whilst studies have begun to explore the role of patient and therapist variables, there is a dearth of research on the actual therapy process and investigation of the interaction between patient and therapist. This study aims to address this paucity through the utilisation of the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-set (APQ) to examine the early treatment period. The sample includes 69 adolescents aged 16-18 years with major depressive disorder receiving STPP as part of the First Experimental Study of Transference Work-in Teenagers (FEST-IT) trial. Of these, 21 were identified as dropouts and were compared to completers on pre-treatment patient characteristics, symptomatology, functioning, and working alliance. APQ ratings available for an early session from 16 of these drop out cases were analysed to explore the patient-therapist interaction structure. Results from the Q-factor analysis revealed three distinct interaction structures that explained 54.3% of the total variance. The first described a process of mutual trust and collaboration, the second was characterised by patient resistance and emotional detachment, the third by a mismatch and incongruence between therapist and adolescent. Comparison between the three revealed interesting differences which taken together provide further evidence that the reasons why adolescents drop out of therapy vary and are multidimensional in nature.

Indexed as

adolescencedropoutinteraction structurespsychodynamic psychotherapyQ-analysistreatment process

Identifiers

PMID34744869
PMCPMC8568886
OpenAlexW3208525197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.