ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
How Does Information Overload Affect Consumers' Online Decision Process? An Event-Related Potentials Study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing cognitive demand fails to mitigate choice overload: Multimodal neural and gaze evidence for effort conservation.iScience · 2026Article
- From Product Disclosure to Brand Trust: How Voluntary Negative-Attribute Disclosure Shapes Cross-Product Responses in Digital Food Interfaces.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Double-Edged Sword Effect of Information Usage Transparency in Privacy Policies on Users' Continuous Use Intention of Apps.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of promotional and preventive framing strategies in AI generated content on neural responses and trust.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Searching for Information on Dairy Products, Their Consumption, and Attitudes Towards New Dairy Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health information addiction and older adults' health product purchases: the mediating role of perceived illness severity and social support.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Impact of High-Barrier Packaging Design on Consumer Preference for Not from Concentrated Orange Juice.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Fairness in Beef Pricing: The Moderating Role of Freshness Under Conditions of Information Overload.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationships between social media use, time management, and decision-making styles.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- How do health content creators perform well? An integration research of short video and livestream behaviors.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Why should I consult? The impact of social support on patient consultation in online healthcare communities.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the advantages of e-retailers is their capability to provide a large amount of information to consumers. However, when the amount of information exceeds consumers' information processing capacities, it will lead to worse decision quality and experience, causing the information overload effect. In this study, the event-related potentials (ERPs) were applied to examine the hidden neural mechanism of the impact of information overload on consumers' decision processes. Behavioral data showed that people would spend more time making decisions when faced with information overload. Neurophysiologically, consumers would invest less attentional resources in the high amount of information (HAI) condition than those in the low amount of information (LAI) condition and lead to less positive P2 amplitudes. The HAI condition would increase decision difficulty than would the LAI condition and result in smaller P3 amplitudes. In addition, an increased late positive component (LPC) was observed for the HAI condition in contrast to the LAI condition, indicating that consumers were more inclined to have decision process regret when consumers were overloaded. We further investigated the dynamic information processing when consumers got over information overload by mining the brain's time-varying networks. The results revealed that during the decision process and the neural response stage, the central area controlled other brain regions' activities for the HAI condition, suggesting that people may still consider and compare other important information after the decision process when faced with information overload. In general, this study may provide neural evidence of how information overload affects consumers' decision processes and ultimately damages decision quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.