ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2021
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare Equipment and Personnel Reservoirs of Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is a feared pathogen in the burn center due to its opportunistic nature and its multidrug resistance. Our purpose was to study the incidence density of Acinetobacter baumannii colonization and infection and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of the strains isolated in patients hospitalized in the Trauma and Burn Center Burn Unit in Tunisia. Our retrospective study included 1517 non-repetitive strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, between January 2012 and September 2020, with an average rate of 12.2% of the service's bacterial ecology. The incidence density of Acinetobacter baumannii colonization and infection was 13.7‰ days of in-patient stay and 14.1‰ days of in-patient stay, respectively. A positive and statistically significant correlation between Acinetobacter baumannii colonization and infection (rs=0,7; p=0.005) was noted in our study. The colonization strains were mainly isolated from central catheters (71.2%) and skin swab samples (22.9%). Infections were dominated by bacteremia (47.6%) and respiratory tract infections (25.4%). Bacteremia was microbiologically documented in 53% of cases. The most common source of bacteremia was central catheters (60.8%), skin (22.2%) and respiratory tract (15.5%). The rates of resistance inAcinetobacter baumannii to the antimicrobial agents tested were high: ceftazidime (85.2%), pipéracillin-tazobactam (95.6%), imipenem (95.3%), amikacine (91.1%), ciprofloxacin (93.5%), rifampicin (36.4%) and cotrimoxazole (88.1%). The resistance of colistin was noted in 1.8% of cases.
Identifiers
34744536PMC8534301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.