Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34744530›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2021

Validation of the Turkish Version of the Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire in an Adult Population.

Seda Kaya, Mahmut Bodur, Merve İlhan Esgin, Funda Pınar Çakıroğlu, Ayşe Özfer Özçelik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Translation and validation of the caffeine use disorder questionnaire in Arabic.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seda KayaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Tepebaşı Neighborhood, Fatih Street, No: 197 Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-3142
Mahmut BodurDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Tepebaşı Neighborhood, Fatih Street, No: 197 Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.
Merve İlhan EsginDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Tepebaşı Neighborhood, Fatih Street, No: 197 Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.
Funda Pınar ÇakıroğluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Tepebaşı Neighborhood, Fatih Street, No: 197 Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşe Özfer ÖzçelikDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Tepebaşı Neighborhood, Fatih Street, No: 197 Keçiören, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ) in an adult population. In this instrument validation study, a total of 310 individuals (253 female, 57 males), with a mean age of 25.96 ± 6.29 years were included. The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts, comprising the sociodemographic characteristics, CUDQ, caffeine withdrawal symptoms, and caffeine consumption. For the evaluation of the data, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), descriptive statistics, and the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11469-021-00688-8.

Indexed as

CaffeineCaffeine use disorderTurkish populationValidation

Identifiers

PMID34744530
PMCPMC8560018
OpenAlexW3210893793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.