Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34744494›Full record

ArticleCluster computing2022

Design and implementation of transaction privacy by virtue of ownership and traceability in blockchain based supply chain.

Mohit Mohit, Sanmeet Kaur, Maninder Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cluster computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohit MohitCSED, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, P.O. Box 32, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab 147004 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3812-014X
Sanmeet KaurCSED, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, P.O. Box 32, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab 147004 India.
Maninder SinghCSED, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, P.O. Box 32, Bhadson Road, Patiala, Punjab 147004 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blockchain was at the top of the 2016 Gartner hype cycle and has been integrated into business profiles by numerous start-ups. Since the emergence of blockchain through Bitcoin, studies have been conducted to increase blockchain applications for nonfinancial uses. A supply chain is a sector where blockchain is anticipated to have crucial applications. In a traditional supply chain, maintaining traceability and ownership remains a serious issue. In the supply chain, blockchain can increase trust, improve traceability, and eliminate the middle man. It makes the supply chain more transparent though, raising the privacy issue. In this paper, a new approach for transaction privacy is proposed by considering ownership and traceability. The proposed system retains the advantages of blockchain and centralised database server. Its novelty lies in achieving privacy by generating symmetric keys, employing product codes and current timestamps, and it uses asymmetric key elliptic curve cryptography for transaction validation and user identification. The proposed system allows product owners to trace the product and enables its transfer. It protects the supply chain from counterfeit products. The Hyperledger Sawtooth blockchain was used for experiments. Security and privacy analysis show that the proposed system can afford privacy without impinging on traceability and ownership. The results estimate that privacy incorporation introduces an overhead of 4.4%. In the experiment, the performance of the proposed system bettered the results of the existing techniques such as POMS and b_verify.

Indexed as

BlockchainCounterfeitsLogisticsPrivacySupply chain

Identifiers

PMID34744494
PMCPMC8561353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.