Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34744197›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of microbiology2021

Application Progress of

Shanshan Li, Qiqi Zhu, Jiaqi Luo, Yangzhen Shu, Kexin Guo, Jingxi Xie, Fangzhu Xiao, Shuya He

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing a new host-vector system forFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanshan LiSchool of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Qiqi ZhuSchool of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Jiaqi LuoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Yangzhen ShuSchool of Resources Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Kexin GuoSchool of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Jingxi XieSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Fangzhu XiaoSchool of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
Shuya HeSchool of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001 Hunan China.
University of South China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radioactive uranium wastewater contains a large amount of radionuclide uranium and other heavy metal ions. The radioactive uranium wastewater discharged into the environment will not only pollute the natural environment, but also threat human health. Therefore, the treatment of radioactive uranium wastewater is a current research focus for many researchers. The treatment in radioactive uranium wastewater mainly includes physical, chemical and biological methods. At present, the using of biological treatment to treat uranium in radioactive uranium wastewater has been gradually shown its superiority and advantages.

Indexed as

Biological treatment of environmental pollutionDeinococcus radioduransGenetic engineering bacteriaUranium wastewater

Identifiers

PMID34744197
PMCPMC8542025
OpenAlexW3194822543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.