ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2021
Using health and safety monitoring routines to enhance sustainable employability.
Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Validation Study of the COPSOQ III Greek Questionnaire for Assessing Psychosocial Factors in the Workplace.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential of stratum corneum biomarkers for assessing psychological distress in health care workers: An observational pilot study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A team level participatory approach aimed at improving sustainable employability of long-term care workers: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2022Article
- The MAastricht Instrument for Sustainable Employability - Italian version (MAISE-IT): a validation study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Digital platforms: Perceived criteria of success, importance of work design, occupational safety and health for present and prospective digital platforms.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditionally, the field of health and employment has mainly focused on preventing unhealthy work practices. Nowadays, there is increasing interest in also promoting a positive work environment. It is relevant to investigate how organizations can integrate both approaches into their work practices. We posit this could promote the sustainable employability of employees.
objectiveWe explored whether a tool that monitors health and safety risks can also be used to create a positive work environment.
methodsAlmost 600 employees completed the Dutch version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). We used regression analyses to investigate the associations between dimensions of work and employees' outcome (stress and sustainable employability). We also validated the Dutch version of this questionnaire by adding Sustainable employability and Vigor.
resultsA theory-based selection of dimensions explained 32%of the variance in Sustainable employability, whereas a set of established predictors explained 16%in Stress. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a good fit of the COPSOQ to the hypothesized model. Reliabilities of the dimensions were satisfactory to good.
conclusionsOur study indicates that organizations can use COPSOQ both as a tool to monitor risk, as well as a means of promoting positive work practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.